You may download the full PDF here.
Social epistemology is the study of the epistemic effects of our social institutions and practices. Related questions have been asked since antiquity, but it has only been since the turn of the twenty-first century that social epistemology has come into its own as a subject of inquiry. Further, social epistemology has never been more relevant, thanks current events like Brexit or the rise of populism in Western democracies. In this course, we will study three of the most important topics of social epistemology: peer disagreement, expert testimony, and collective epistemology. We will study the work of Feldman, Fricker, Zagzebski, Elga, Goldman, and many others. No prior advanced knowledge of epistemology is required for success in this course, but some general familiarity will be assumed.
1. E-Readings, as per the schedule.
||Two 1400-word essays on topics assigned by the Instructor.
||One 2250-word essay chosen from topics assigned by the Instructor.
||Self-assessed on the quality and quantity of participation.
||One sit-down cumulative examination.
||Syllabus; Clifford (1877), “The Ethics of Belief”
||Feldman, “Reasonable Religious Disagreements”
||Christensen, “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News”
||Elgin, “Persistent Disagreement”
||Goldman, “Experts: Which Ones Do You Trust?”
||Turner, “What’s the Problem with Experts?
||Whyte and Crease, “Trust, Expertise, and the Philosophy of Science”
||Lane, “When the Experts are Uncertain: Scientific Knowledge and the Ethics of Democratic Judgment”
||Surowiecki, “The Wisdom of Crowds”
||Pettit, “When to Defer to Majority Testimony—And When Not”
||Fricker, M. “Group Testimony: The Making of a Collective Good Informant”
||Lackey, “What is Justified Group Belief?”