Download the pdf here.
Course Description
Everyone is trying to convince us of something: companies try to convince us to buy their products; politicians try to convince us to support them; or, our friends try to convince us to go out instead of studying. The primary means by which these attempts at persuasion are carried out is through arguments—a series of premises used to convince you to accept a conclusion. This course is designed to improve your ability to spot, assess, and respond to arguments, and to create strong arguments of your own. You will learn the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning, and the unique methods of dealing with them. You will learn how to recognize logical fallacies and will be able to avoid them in your own writing. Finally, you will learn about cognitive biases and how they are used to exploit our reasoning.
Course Texts
- Hughes, William and Lavery, Jonathan. Critical Thinking: An Introduction to the Basic Skills (7th Canadian Edition). Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2016. (Required)
- Readings on electronic reserve. (Required)
Course Requirements
Requirement |
Description |
Weight |
Date |
Unit Tests |
Two tests on the material from Units One and Two. |
2×12.5% |
Weeks 06 & 12 |
Short Project |
One project to test competency with material from Unit Three. |
15% |
Week 18 |
Long Project |
A cumulative project designed to test your competency with the course material, especially Units Three and Four. |
25% |
Week 24 |
Weekly Assignments |
Worth three points each, with an extra point for participation. See description for more details. |
10% |
Weekly |
Final Examination |
One sit-down cumulative examination. |
25% |
See Registrar |
Tentative Schedule
Term One
Week |
Topic |
Readings |
01 |
Welcome! |
Syllabus, E1 |
Clarifying Ideas
02 |
Statements, definitions, and assertions |
CT: 2.3 to 2.11, 2.12 |
03 |
Clarifying statements |
CT: 3.1 to 3.6, 3.7 |
04 |
Necessary & sufficient conditions |
CT: 3.8, 3.9 |
05 |
Standard form |
CT: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.8 |
06 |
[Review & Unit Test 1] |
N/A |
Assessing Arguments
07 |
Good Arguments: Introduction |
CT: 5.1 to 5.3 |
08 |
Testing for acceptability |
CT: 6.3 to 6.7, 6.8 |
09 |
Testing for relevance |
CT: 7.1 to 7.4, 7.5 |
10 |
Testing for adequacy |
CT: 8.1 to 8.6, 8.7 |
11 |
Never read the comments [flex] |
E2 |
12 |
[Review & Unit Test 2] |
N/A |
Term Two
Week |
Topic |
Readings |
13 |
Welcome back! [review] |
Your notes from T1. |
Thinking it Through
14 |
Deductive reasoning |
CT: 9.1 to 9.5, 9.6 |
15 |
Inductive & abductive reasoning |
CT: 10.1 to 10.5, 10.6 |
16 |
Scientific reasoning |
CT: 11.1 to 11.2, 11.3, 11.4 |
17 |
Moral reasoning |
CT: 12.1 to 12.3, 12.4, 12.9 |
18 |
Information literacy [flex] |
CT: 16.1 to 16.4, E3 |
19 |
How to Win the Internet
20 |
Starving the trolls [counterarguments] |
CT: 14.1 to 14.4, 14.5 |
21 |
Fighting dirty [rhetoric] |
CT: 15.1 to 15.10, 15.11, E4 |
22 |
23 |
Know thine enemy [cognitive biases] |
E5 |
24 |
Knowing when to quit |
E6 |
Legend
CT |
Critical Thinking: An Introduction to the Basic Skills (7th Canadian Edition) |
E1 |
Clifford, W. K. “The Ethics of Belief” (selections) |
E2 |
[News articles from competing sources with different biases on current events] |
E3 |
[Opinion pieces for hot political topic] |
E4 |
Swift, Jonathan. “A Modest Proposal” |
E5 |
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow (selections) |
E6 |
James, W. Pragmatism (selections) |
Italics |
Indicate recommended self-test |